Imagine potential additions or modifications to two different sustainability motivated policies in the US: (1) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and (2) the Conservation Reserve Program. Each student will propose an addition or modification to one of the policies that is intended to increase sustainability. The proposed addition must be intentionally motivated from an egalitarian OR individual perspective. Then, each student will respond to proposals from students in the other policy by selecting the addition they believe will be most effective, stating why, and identifying which perspective that motivated the policy. Conceive of an addition or change to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act that will improve sustainability. State your idea in an initial discussion post of at least 200 words. You addition must intentionally be motivated by an egalitarian or individual perspective (your choice), but do not state which in your initial post. Include at least one credible source related to your proposal. This post must be made by Tuesday, July 14 at 11:59 pm. 2. Review the suggestions for additions to the Conservation Reserve Program by the students in your class group. Post a response (at least 100 words) to the proposed addition that you think will be most effective indicating your reasons for selecting that addition. Indicate which world view (egalitarian or individual) you think motivated this addition and why you believe this. This post must be made by Wednesday, July 15 at 11:59 pm 3. After Wednesday, July 15 at 11:59 pm, respond to your original post indicating which world view (egalitarian or individual) motivated your addition to the policy. This post must be made by Thursday, July 16 at 11:59 pm. Discussion Grading Thorough initial proposal for and addition to the policy including a citation of a credible source (at least 200 words). Correct grammar and spelling; professional tone. Selection of most effective policy clearly indicated why it will be most effective and clear description of world view that motivates proposal (at least 100 words). Correct grammar and spelling; professional tone. Response indicating initial proposal world view.