For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

the [paper 2 pages plus reference and title page but they also have to make a ta
the [paper 2 pages plus reference and title page but they also have to make a table This assignment addresses the following objective: Identify primary and secondary data sources and users of the medical record. This assignment addresses the following AHIMA Entry-Level Competencies: Associate I.6 Describe components of data dictionaries and data sets. Associate I.6 (DM Only) Evaluate data dictionaries and data sets for compliance with governance standards. Instructions As an HIM Professional, you will be using multiple data sets. It is important to understand the purpose, goals, and contents of health care data sets. Step One: Perform a web search and locate information on HEDIS, UHDDS, and OASIS Step Two: Review the information in Chapter Five: Clinical Terminologies, Classifications, and Code Systems Step Three: Using the Table feature of Microsoft Word or Excel, create a table that contains information about 6 different health care data sets (three of which must be HEDIS, UHDDS, and OASIS). The columns of the spreadsheet should be: Name of Data Set Purpose Primary Users Unique Features How It is Used Be sure that if you use Excel, the spreadsheet is formatted as a table. Use “Wrap Text” and other formatting features of Excel. Step Four: Analyze the data sets in order to provide a comprehensive comparison and contrast of them including the pros and cons of using these standardized data sets in healthcare. Step Five: Submit your paper/spreadsheet for grading. Your assignment should include APA formatting including references and citations. If you use Excel, merge cells to create a large text area to hold your references. Estimated time to complete: 3 hours Rubric HI210 Unit 4 Assignment - Data Sets HI210 Unit 4 Assignment - Data Sets Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 45 pts Level 5 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 40.5 pts Level 4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 36 pts Level 3 Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 31.5 pts Level 2 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 27 pts Level 1 Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. 0 pts Level 0 There is no evidence of a defined statement. 45 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 30 pts Level 5 Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 27 pts Level 4 Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 24 pts Level 3 Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 21 pts Level 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 18 pts Level 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 0 pts Level 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 20 pts Level 5 The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 18 pts Level 4 The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 16 pts Level 3 The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 14 pts Level 2 The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 12 pts Level 1 The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0 pts Level 0 The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 5 pts Level 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 4.5 pts Level 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 4 pts Level 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.5 pts Level 2 The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3 pts Level 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0 pts Level 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. 5 pts Total Points: 100

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now