Learning Goal: I'm working on a philosophy writing question and need a reference to help me learn. (3 pages ) Carefully explain Singer's argument for the claim that we (the absolute wealthy) are morally obligated to contribute to famine relief. (Make sure you explain each of his three premises and his conclusion.) Critically evaluate Singer's argument in light of Kant's view of our obligations to our fellow man. (Note: You cannot agree with both Singer and Kant; they take opposing positions.) Who do you think is right, Singer or Kant? Defend your answer.