For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

This score will be awarded when the submission is generally well written, but there may be small errors in organizational structure or ease of reading
Learning Goal: I'm working on a business exercise and need support to help me learn. Assignment TED Reflection 2For this assignment, please begin by watching the TED talk provided to you in the week 5 content page. (Video Assignment: Inside the Mind of a Master Procrastinator)Once you have watched the talk, I would like you to reflect back on what you've learned and write at least a paragraph that addresses the following questions: Did you enjoy the talk? Why or why not? What was the most interesting and/or valuable thing you learned? As a manager, how could/would you apply what you learned from the talk in the workplace? In order to be eligible for full credit, your submission must answer all of the above questions and consist of at least 250 thoughtful, proofread words. It will be scored using the Reflection Rubric, which is attached to this assignment. Rubric Reflection Rubric (2) Reflection Rubric (2) CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 17 ptsExemplary 17 points will be awarded when the reflection successfully addresses all of the questions provided in the assignment guidelines and consists of at least 250 words 14 ptsMeets Expectations 14 points will be awarded when the response addresses all of the questions listed in the prompt but it is at least 25% under the minimum length requirement OR when the response meets the length requirement but fails to address at least one of the questions listed in the prompt. 10 ptsNeeds Improvement 10 points will be awarded when the submission is at least 25% under the minimum length requirement and it fails to address at least one of the questions required by the prompt 0 ptsDoes Not Meet Minimum Standards 0 points will be awarded when the submission is at least 50% shy of the minimum word count and/or does not actually address the prompt. 17 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity 4 ptsExemplary This score will be awarded when the submission is well-organized and easy to read and understand. 3 ptsMeets Expectations This score will be awarded when the submission is generally well written, but there may be small errors in organizational structure or ease of reading 2 ptsNeeds Improvement This score will be awarded when the student occasionally struggles with both organization and ease of reading 0 ptsDoes Not Meet Minimum Standards 0 points will be awarded when the organizational structure and quality of writing are both so poor as to consistently compromise clarity 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar 4 ptsExemplary This score will be awarded when there are few, if any, grammatical errors, and those errors that are present do not compromise readability. 3 ptsMeets Expectations This score will be awarded when there are several types of grammatical errors, but they rarely compromise readability. 2 ptsNeeds Improvement This score will be awarded when there are a number of grammatical errors, and they frequently compromise readability 0 ptsDoes Not Meet Minimum Standards 0 points will be awarded when there are 20+ grammatical errors, and readability is consistently compromised 4 pts Total Points: 25

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now